|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
48
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 21:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Or you could stop stamping your feet and making a noise and build a case for change.
Once the election is out of the way, petition that case for change through the elected CSMs. |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
51
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 01:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Miners!
I've created a thread asking the CSM 7 candidates to tell you all what they will do for you if elected and so far none of the other candidates have even bothered to answer.
Demand that your CSM 7 candidates come clean and let you know if they are committed to making your life better!
And please be active on the mining miners channel! We need to show CCP we can be an organized voice to be reckoned with!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend
Why should they say anything in your thread?
CSMs once elected should work as a team, you don't strike me as a team player, although you obviously like to lead. |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 01:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Miners!
I've created a thread asking the CSM 7 candidates to tell you all what they will do for you if elected and so far none of the other candidates have even bothered to answer.
Demand that your CSM 7 candidates come clean and let you know if they are committed to making your life better!
And please be active on the mining miners channel! We need to show CCP we can be an organized voice to be reckoned with!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend Why should they say anything in your thread? CSMs once elected should work as a team, you don't strike me as a team player, although you obviously like to lead. I work very well in a team. But the reason is the CSM is a team, but if no one on that team is interested in improving mining it will never get brought up to CCP. So if you are OK with mining as it is today then no reason to look for a candidate interested in improving mining because if no one is elected interested in representing the miners it won't get brought up by the CSM 7. Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
I'm sure CCP are aware of the problems/limitations of mining. I suspect mining has not been seen as a high enough priority (a lot of miners semi-afk mine anyway), although it will probably get a make-over at some point.
CSMs should represent improving the game, which would include mining as it's part of it. They should not be just representing their own interests.
|
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 02:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote: The chair of the CSM 6 has repeatedly stated he only represents his constituency and has no interest in representing all of Eve.
If that's true then he was not the right person for the position.
CSMs should work seperate from the game but focused on the game and the players. CSMs should not be an extension of the game. |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 02:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Sasha Azala wrote:Issler Dainze wrote: The chair of the CSM 6 has repeatedly stated he only represents his constituency and has no interest in representing all of Eve.
If that's true then he was not the right person for the position. CSMs should work seperate from the game but focused on the game and the players. CSMs should not be an extension of the game. Name a single thing that the chair of CSM6 did that was bad for people who didn't vote for him. Just one.
Looking after a section of the game does not necessarily benefit the game as a whole. Especially when the CSMs probably don't have equal say and not all areas will be represented under that mannar of leadership.
So I can see Issler's concerns regarding will mining have an equal say if a say at all, if The Chair has no interest in representing all players and the game as a whole.
The whole game should be looked at, not just piece parts. |
Sasha Azala
Blood and Decay
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 02:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:many folks Considering your idea of a million miner march consisted of 14 people, your perception of how many people are mad at The Mittani is suspect.
It was never going to be a million, it was just used for effect. Only 50k accounts online at the busiest time of the week. |
|
|
|